|
Redesigning the modern city. Ideas Competition for the upgrading of the
Rozzol Melara quarter of Trieste
|
|
son
başvuru tarihi:
|
31.07.2002
|
teslim
tarihi:
|
18.10.2002
|
|
Registration
deadline:
|
Submission
deadline:
|
|
Yarışma Özeti(Summary):
Tip
(Type):
Kimler katılabilir
(Open to):
Katılım ücreti
(Entry Fee):
Ödüller
(Awards):
Juri
(Jury):
İletişim Bilgileri
(Contact):
Competition secretariat
The Secretariat for the competition is:
Ater-Unit` Operativa Relazioni Esterne
Piazza Foraggi n. 6
34139 TRIESTE
[email protected]
0403999454/0403999203
Fax 040390885
Hours: 10.00 a.m.-13.00 p.m.
International ideas competition of urban design, open to professionals
eligible for the practice of Architect or Engineer under 40 years of age.
Application deadline: 12.00 am, 31 July 2002.
Submission deadline: 12.00 am, 18 October 2002.
1. Organisers, procedure committee and competition secretariat Organisers
Ater-Public Housing Agency of the Trieste Province, Faculty of
Architecture-University of Trieste, Municipality of Trieste, Province of
Trieste, Roll of Architects, Planners, Landscape designers and Conservation
specialists of the Trieste Province, Ministry of Cultural Properties and
Activities-General Directorate for Contemporary Architecture and Art.
The competition brief is posted on the web site http://www.units.it/architet/ater/
2. Type of competition
It is an open, anonymous, one stage international ideas competition.
3. Object and purpose of the competition
The Ater-Public Housing Agency of the Trieste Province, on the occasion of the
centenary of its founding, announces, together with the Faculty of Architecture
of Trieste, the Municipality of Trieste, the Province of Trieste, the Roll of
Architects, Planners, Landscape designers and Conservation specialists of the
Trieste Province, the General Directorate for Contemporary Architecture and Art
of the Ministry of Cultural Properties and Activities, an international ideas
competition for the upgrading of the Borgo San Sergio and Rozzol Melara quarters
of Trieste. This Brief regards only the Rozzol Melara area.
The Ater of Trieste was founded on 14 July 1902 as a Municipal Institute for
Affordable Housing (Icam) and in 1924 it became the Autonomous Public Housing
Institute (Iacp). The Ater of Trieste is one of the first public bodies in
charge of operating low cost housing in Europe. It was taken as an example in
the drafting of the Italian legislation on public housing approved in 1903 and
as a model for the foundation of the first institutes established in Italy.
Throughout the 20th century, the Icam-Iacp-Ater built about one fourth of the
homes of Trieste, and became the most important operator in the field of
housing, contributing substantially to the construction of the city and to the
definition of its urban and architectural image.
The Ater of Trieste, together with the other important city and national
institutions promoting the competition, wants to take the opportunity of its
centenary not only to look back to its history, but also to reflect upon the
role the institute has played in the growth of the city and in the improvement
of its spaces, as well as to look to the future development of Trieste and its
province, and, more broadly to deal with outskirts upgrading themes.
This competition aims at redesigning the Rozzol Melara quarter - along with
Borgo San Sergio, object of the second brief - in order to start a more general
reflection on the conditions of those parts of city promoted by different public
administrations during the 20th century with the aim of meeting considerable
housing needs. These housing complexes are the result of a unitary scheme
involving spaces and facilities as well. But during the implementation stage, or
afterwards, these complexes had already partially lost their character of being
exemplar and recognisable. As expressions of different ideas of cities and
living space, these quarters are significant evidence of different policies,
cultures and techniques, which proposals should not only seek to upgrade but
also to protect and conserve.
In particular, this competition aims to reappraise the meaning, the shape and
the function of collective and relational spaces within the quarter unit, since
we are convinced that these elements can play a fundamental role in new
development processes. During the design phase, these spaces and their function
were to form and represent new communities of citizens. However, the separation
between the construction phase of the buildings and the implementation of the
open space scheme, as well as the different levels of care and maintenance of
the un-built area, has often led to negative effects on the quality of the
entire "living space", both built and open.
Competitors are asked to submit a project proposal for Rozzol Melara, which
aims at improving the living space of the quarter and, on the whole, at
redefining its role within the surrounding urban context.
The Ater and the Municipality of Trieste could draw from the proposals submitted
in this competition for future interventions regarding the aforementioned
project site.
4. Areas and themes of the project
4.1. The location of the quarter
The housing complex of Rozzol Melara is located on the eastern edge of the city
of Trieste, on a ridge exposed to the north winds but in an ideal geographic
position: the building lies on the slope of the hill at the top of the Rozzol
valley which overlooks the city and the sea; the Karst ridge, scarred by some
quarries, rises behind the quarter and is separated from it by the Longera
valley.
The selection of this location since the design phase, which was carried out
from the late 60s to the early 70s, reflected an intention of detachment and
otherness. This was partially modified by the following new construction of
public housing, along the northern and western borders of the complex, as well
as of scattered small housing units on the slope of the Rozzol valley.
4.2. Notes on the original project and on the construction of the quarter
The site of Rozzol Melara was chosen by the Municipality of Trieste in 1964 with
a plan ex lege 167/62, which envisaged in the Peep (Public and Economic Housing
Plan) area the construction of a semi-intensive housing quarter, where several
building types (from the row to the tower) had to be organised following the
slope of the ground according to an "organic" design.
The allotment of the area to the Iacp of Trieste four years later marks a
reversal of the trend. The designers called to draw up the new urban plan of the
quarter were asked by the Institute to "gather the buildings". The
design team, co-ordinated by Carlo Celli, comprised 29 professionals selected
with the collaboration of the local Rolls of architects and engineers; Guido
Ferrara participated for the design of the green spaces. The initial phases of
the project proceed along the lines of the research carried out by the Social
Studies Centre of the Iacp and by the International Sociology Institute of
Gorizia. These studies were aimed at identifying the housing needs of Trieste
with special reference to the organisation of social and community services.
The project was drafted between 1968 and 1971, with following variants during
the years until 1974 and finally implemented in 1981. It encompasses an area of
11 hectares where a building complex accommodating 2500 residents stands
(minimum threshold identified by the sociologic analysis). It comprised 648
flats, a civic and social centre, a health centre, more than twenty shops, an
elementary and a middle school, a parish centre and a common garage.
The shape of the residential complex is that of a large courtyard building
consisting of two juxtaposed multi-storey L-shaped units which are connected by
a system of covered pathways and collective services forming a large cross in
the central courtyard.
The main aim of the designers was to counter a typical suburban situation,
consisting of "relatively new buildings, scattered throughout the area
without an organised skeleton", with a structure "conceived as a
landmark for its quality and concentration of facilities for the organisation of
the associated life" but also as a "connective tissue of the
surrounding homes, which enables the organisation of the territory ... giving
each [urban] element a function within the wide city scene" (C. Celli,
"Pubblico e privato nell'insediamento di Rozzol Melara", Casabella,
n.437, 1978).
The inspiring principles of the urban and housing project can be summarised as
follows:
- the choice of high density housing, assumed as both a typical urban feature
and an element able to foster social exchanges; the rejection of the model of a
single, finished self-sufficient building, which is countered with a building
thought as part of the urban fabric, as generative element of "complex
relations which establish a dialogue with a wider surrounding" (ibid.); in
search of integration with the surroundings, the quarter should have played the
role of polarising and upgrading element of the urban periphery;
- the organisation of the residential complex not as an aggregate of dwelling
cells, but rather as "a multiple function spatial organisation", where
homes and facilities should have integrated, acquiring meaning and value within
their mutual relation;
- the research of a unitary image through the design of the central space: a
large court-square which had to be both a symbolic space of the settled
community and a "place where the relation between the urban surrounding and
the new settlement occurs" (ibid., p. 37);
- the separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic with the creation of a
single road axis across the courtyard serving the two-storey underground garage;
- the construction of a close relationship between public and private areas,
through a network of public and collective spaces connecting and integrating the
system of private living space.
The large courtyard building is strongly characterized by the system of open and
covered spaces for collective use, which defines an ordering "grid"
arranged on two levels: "at the lower floor it consists of a pedestrian
indoor level walkway which links the most important facilities", while at
the upper floor it consists of a similar walkway connected by two bridges to the
outdoor promenade on the roof of the lower building; shops for day to day
provisions, common loggias and the staircase lobbies open onto the internal
roads.
Purposefully some of these collective spaces were not planned to accommodate
facilities, but were imagined to be available for any collective activity
autonomously run by the residents.
The open space design of Rozzol Melara also drew inspiration from the quest
for a different way of living and it also aims at consolidating relationships
within the community.
By identifying categories of users of the "quarter's green areas", the
project analysed their different needs, proposing the construction of leisure
facilities to enable the integration of spaces dedicated to different age
ranges: "a series of facilities open to anybody who dwells and 'lives' in
the quarter without distinction, so that children, parents, teachers and elders
can find a reference in them, so that they can become the tools of an
associative life of a higher social and cultural level" (G. Ferrara,
"La progettazione del verde", Edilizia popolare, n. 123, 1975).
The project paid special attention to the following themes:
- the design of a green "connective tissue" and of a network of routes
which articulate open structures and spaces for different uses;
- the creation of an open space, marked by a "theatre" platform placed
in close relation with the social centre located in the intersection of the
services. It had to be the place where the "social moments" of the
quarter would concentrate;
- the definition of different playgrounds according to the age of the users
("play yards", "wild areas", etc.);
- the involvement of the dwellers in the creation of their living environment.
The current problems of the quarter are due partly to the management of the
complex after its construction, partly to the lack of urban planning control of
the zone where the building stands. On one hand, we have witnessed an
impoverishment of the potentials of the common places system with the
abandonment of many spaces which were to accommodate different services and
facilities. These instead have often found a different location just outside the
residential courtyard. On the other hand, the ever more numerous buildings built
afterwards around the complex by co-operatives and other bodies have thwarted
some of the potential relationships which the original project had conceived.
4.3. The competition area and the suggested project themes
The competition area encompasses the entire Rozzol Melara district, vie
Marchesetti and Forlanini mark the limit to the east and to the west. The
boundaries shown in the attached planimetry are to be considered as an
indication and can be better defined and in case modified during the design
process.
The project will have to satisfy the following requirements:
- the upgrading of the large central space of the courtyard-square, if necessary
even with demolition and/or reconstruction, aimed to restore its original
function of meeting and relational place between the community living in the
quarter and the people living in the area gravitating towards it;
- the redefinition of the relation between residence, basic service system and
collective spaces which the original project located along the roads within the
two L-shaped buildings. These latter are today scarcely utilised and are often
abandoned;
- the redesign of marginal areas of the complex, in particular of those facing
towards the city of Trieste, where there are some of the services
"expelled" from the central building and onto which the new
residential buildings developed since the 80s face. These currently appear
unable to establish a relation with the large building.
Other possible project themes could concern:
- alternative solutions to the current vehicular access system, consisting of
the only diagonal road crossing the quadrilateral and of the two-storey
semi-underground car park;
- proposals taking into consideration the design of the ground not only inside
the central courtyard but also outside it.
5. Participation terms and conditions
5.1. The competition is open to individual architects and/or engineers, as well
as grouped in working teams. At the time of the publication of the competition
brief the architect and/or engineer, according to the competition rules, must
hold a professional qualification of architect or engineer as defined by the
legal requirements in existence in their country.
If in the country of residence the professional qualification is not defined by
law, the competitors must hold a diploma, examination certificate or other
qualifying certificate listed in the EU Directive 85/384/EEC or 89/48/EEC.
In any case the participants, at the time of the publication of the competition
brief, must be eligible to practise their profession in their respective
country, and not restricted in the their self-employed profession by any
legislative limitation or disciplinary measure.
5.2. The following may participate in the competition:
- individual persons who comply with all the conditions set out in paragraph
5.1.;
- juridical persons, provided that the party or association is able to comply
with the task of the competition. In the case of juridical persons, at least one
of the members must hold the qualifications required to individual persons for
the participation in the competition and this information must be reported in
the authorship declaration. This person will be the sole interlocutor with the
competition organisers;
- temporary associations of professionals, with the indication of the architect
or engineer who is the person in charge of the design project and representative
of the group (team leader).
5.3. Competitors may participate individually, in associations or temporary
groupings. Each group when entering the competition is to designate a member as
the team representative and sole interlocutor with the organisers.
5.4. Each participant can submit only one project. Each party may not
participate contemporarily in more than one group on pain of disqualification of
the party as well as all the groups participating with him. Every juridical
person and every association of professionals will each be considered a
participant in the competition. For this reason, even associations may not
participate in the competition with more than one project. Any infringement will
lead to the disqualification of the projects submitted by the offending party.
5.5. The participants in the competition may employ one or more collaborators,
qualified personnel, who need not comply with the participation requirements.
These figures are to be indicated in the authorship declaration although their
participation will not influence the jury's assessment.
5.6. Every participant is to carefully check the necessary requirements for
participation. Participation takes place on one's own responsibility.
5.7. All the parties participating in the competition (except for collaborators)
must be under 40 years old at the date of the publication of this brief.
5.8. The presentation of the projects is to be made anonymously. Any form of
identification or distinguishing mark which might reveal the name of the
competitors is to be omitted. Should the Postal service require the indication
of the sender, the display shall be that of one of the competition organisers.
6. Application procedure
In order to participate in the competition, applications must reach the
Secretariat address no later than 12.00 a.m. on 31 July 2002 by mail or fax. The
applications must be drawn up on the form downloadable from the web site www.units.it/architet/ater/
Upon entering the competition the name, surname, date of birth, address,
telephone, e-mail and fax of the candidate or group leader, who is to be the
reference for any communication, must be indicated and undersigned by every
member of the team.
7. Criteria of ineligibility
7.1. The competitors who do not respect the terms of the application and/or the
delivery of projects, or who infringe the principle of anonymity of submissions
will be disqualified.
7.2. The following may not participate in the competition:
- spouses, relatives and in-laws up to the third degree of the jury members;
- employees of the competition organisers or those who hold a co-ordinated and
continuous collaboration with the members of the jury;
- those who have taken part in drawing up the brief and the attached documents
as well as those who are continuous collaborators of the organising bodies and
institutions.
8. Competition documentation
The organisers will provide the participants with the following materials:
- the competition brief and its attachments;
- iconographic documentation;
- outline of the competition area;
- cartography and application form.
All the materials are available on the web site www.units.it/architet/ater/.
9. Submission details
Design projects are to be submitted on 3 A1 horizontal tables and in a bound
album size A3, composed of a maximum of 12 pages plus the cover. Both the tables
and the album cover shall bear in the top right corner a motto with a maximum of
40 characters including spaces, 1 cm high, and on the tables the Arabic number
corresponding to their presentation order.
Under no circumstances may the competitors infringe the anonymity with symbols,
marks or other identifying elements.
Texts may be written in Italian or English. The projects required shall use the
decimal metric system as the system of measurement and contain a metric graphic
reference in order to enable publication in reduced formats.
The 3 tables, black-and-white or colour, mounted on light rigid panels shall
contain, in the scale deemed most appropriate:
- a general plan of the area with the inclusion of the project;
- plans, elevations and meaningful sections of the project;
- axonometric drawings, perspectives, photomontages and any other graphic
representation suitable for the purpose of illustrating the project.
The black-and white or coloured album shall contain:
- a report of 8000 characters including spaces maximum, in case illustrated with
pictures, sketches and graphic diagrams, containing the guiding criteria for the
project and its urban integration in the context;
- a reduced scale reproduction of the 3 tables of the project.
10. Submission delivery
The projects must be delivered in a sealed envelope, bearing the title of the
competition on the outside.
The envelope shall contain:
- the 3 tables and the album;
- a CD-Rom labelled with the chosen motto containing three .tiff extension files
representing the tables submitted, one .rtf file with the report and a 2000
characters (including spaces) maximum abstract of the report;
- an anonymous opaque sealed envelope containing the particulars of the
competitor or of the members of the group. The envelope must also contain: the
designation of the group leader undersigned by all the group members and their
names, including those of possible consultants and/or collaborators; a
declaration of each competitor attesting compliance with the necessary
participation requirements (the Competition Secretariat will verify the contents
of the self-declaration and disqualify from the competition in case it proves to
be even partly untrue); the authorisation to exhibit and possibly publish the
design projects and to cite the names of the designers, non-winners as well. On
each sheet the motto chosen by each competitor or team will have to be
indicated.
The projects must reach the Competition Secretariat by 12.00 am on 18 October
2002. In those cases in which delivery of projects is assigned to a carrier
(state postal service or authorised couriers), they must be postmarked no later
than 12.00 am on 18 October 2002 (the postmark is proof) and the package must be
received within the following seven days. Any delay is considered reason for
exclusion. The competition organisers are not responsible to the competitors in
case of loss of the package.
11. Schedule
Application deadline: 12.00 am on 31 July 2002.
Submission deadline: 12.00 am on 18 October 2002.
Competition results will be announced by 30 November 2002.
The awarding of prizes will coincide with the opening of the exhibition
1902-2002 Icam-Iacp-Ater: a century of public housing in Trieste.
12. Jury
The jury is composed of: Manuel de Las Casas, Bernardo Secchi, the President of
the Ater, the Dean of the Faculty of Architecture of Trieste, Paola Di Biagi
coordinator of the initiatives for the Ater centenary and professor at the
Faculty of Architecture of Trieste, the Major of Trieste, the Land Planning
Councillor of the Municipality of Trieste, the President of the Trieste
Province, the President of the Roll of Architects, Planners, Landscape designers
and Conservation specialists of the Trieste Province, the General Director for
Contemporary Architecture and Art of the Ministry of Cultural Properties and
Activities. Each representative of the organising bodies can possibly appoint a
deputy.
The two Secretaries for the competition will take part in the meeting of the
jury without right of vote.
The jury will judge the entries within 40 days from the submission date.
13. Jury proceedings and competition results
The jury's proceedings will be secret, and considered effective with the
presence of at least half plus one of its members. The president will be
appointed by the jury members during the first meeting.
The jury deliberation is unappealable. A draft of the minutes containing the
jury's proceedings and the judgement on the projects will be drawn up during the
meeting and signed by the jury members at the end of the proceedings.
Results will be sent by registered post to the winners. The names of the winners
and the jury's report will be posted on the web site
www.units.it/architet/ater/.
14. Prizes and honourable mentions
The competition overall prize money amount totals 9,000 Euro, divided as
follows:
First prize: 4.000 Euro
Second prize: 2.500 Euro
Third prize: 1.500 Euro
2 mentions: 500 Euro each
The jury can modify the number and the division of the prizes if by general
consent it considers that the quality of the projects does not comply with the
fixed division of the prize money.
The jury reserves the right to mention, without reward, design solutions showing
innovative aspects.
15. Publication of competition results
The prize-winning entries and honourable mentions will be displayed in the
exhibition 1902-2002 Icam-Iacp-Ater: a century of public housing in Trieste.
The Ater reserves the right to publish the project proposals in the modality
deemed most appropriate (catalogue of events, national and international
magazines, web sites). Moreover, the Ministry of Cultural Properties and
Activities will decide whether to publish winning entries and honourable
mentions on its web site.
16. Ownership of the design projects
Authors hold rights of intellectual ownership of their projects. The winning
entries or honourable mentions will become the property of the Ater of Trieste.
The remaining entries will be available to the competitors who may collect them
at their own expense, from the Competition Secretariat, on furnishing proof of
identity, after 3 March 2003 and no later than 30 April 2003.
After this date the Ater will no longer be held responsible for the conservation
of the submitted materials.
Attachments
References regarding Rozzol Melara (in chronological order)
- G. Ferrara, "La progettazione del verde", Edilizia popolare, n. 123,
1975, pp. 72-82.
- NdR, "Iacp di Trieste, quartiere di Rozzol Melara", Edilizia
popolare, n. 133, 1976, pp. 83-86.
- NdR, "Celli-Tognon: opere e progetti", Casabella, n. 419, 1976, pp.
48-57.
- C. Celli, "Pubblico e privato nell'insediamento di Rozzol Melara",
Casabella, n. 437, 1978, pp. 36-43.
- P. Taccheo, "I costi di Rozzol Melara", Casabella, n. 437, 1978, pp.
42-43.
- Istituto autonomo per le case popolari di Trieste, Rozzol Melara, supplement
to n. 20 of Casa Iacp, 1978.
- Istituto autonomo per le case popolari della Provincia di Trieste, Rozzol
Melara. Esperienze di una ipotesi di habitat alternativo, Trieste 1980.
- A. Acocella, Complessi residenziali nell'Italia degli anni '70, Alinea,
Firenze 1981, pp. 87-104.
- Aa.Vv., Citt` per vivere? Risposte significative nell'Italia degli anni '80,
Sagep, Genova 1983, pp. 142-148.
- F. Castro, Edilizia popolare a Trieste, Edizioni Lint, Trieste 1992, pp.
76-79.
List of cartographic and iconographic materials
Cartography available on the web site:
- General planimetry of the city of Trieste, scale 1:25.000 (formats .dwg,
.dxf);
- Rozzol Melara planimetry, scale 1:5.000 (formats .dwg, .dxf);
- Topographic map of Rozzol Melara, scale 1:1.000 (format .tiff) with
descriptive text.
Outline of the competition area and iconographic documentation available on
this site:
- Planimetry of the city of Trieste with the location of the quarter, scale
1:25.000 (format .jpg);
- Planimetry with the definition of the competition area border, scale 1:5.000
(format .jpg);
- Project planimetry showing the inclusion of the building complex of Rozzol
Melara in the urban contest
- Zenith view of the building complex project (Source: NdR, "Celli-Tognon:
opere e progetti", Casabella, n. 219, 1976);
- Photographs of the building complex at the closure of the building yard, black
and white (Source: arch. Luciano Celli archive);
- Photographs of the current situation, colour (Source: Ater Trieste archive);
- Planivolumetry of the Peep project, Municipality of Trieste, 1964 (Source:
NdR, "Iacp di Trieste, quartiere di Rozzol Melara", Edilizia Popolare,
n. 133, 1976);
- Outline of the planimetric solution opposed to the Peep project of 1964
(Source: F. Castro, Edilizia popolare a Trieste, Edizioni Lint, Trieste, 1992);
- Interpretation outline of the interior organisation of collective routes
(Source: Aa.Vv., Citt` per vivere? Risposte significative nell'Italia degli anni
'80, Sagep, Genova 1983);
- Project planimetries of the different levels of the building and project
structural outline of the building (Source: C. Celli, "Pubblico e privato
nell'insediamento di Rozzol Melara", Casabella, n. 437, 1978);
- Project axonometric outlines of the type-spans (Source: ibidem);
- Isometric Axonometry of the building complex (Source: ibidem)
- Assonometric section of a span with the different types of flat (Source:
ibidem);
- Planimetry of the green areas arrangement within the courtyard (Source: G.
Ferrara, "La progettazione del verde", Edilizia popolare, n. 123,
1975);
- Perspective sketch of the cycle and skating tracks (Source: ibidem).
|
|